Is it accurate to say that a person had a "near drowning" if they survive?

A "near drowning" is accurately described as an incident where a person has experienced a drowning event but survives, experiencing significant physical response. The essential criterion is that the individual had an episode where they were unable to breathe due to submersion in water, which can result in respiratory issues or even long-term health impacts.

Considering the context of lifeguard training, terminology like "near drowning" emphasizes the critical nature of the event and the need for immediate assistance and medical evaluation, regardless of the duration of submersion. Therefore, asserting that someone had a "near drowning" when they survive does not accurately encapsulate the seriousness of the event if we consider the potential consequences following the incident.

In terms of the other options, it is important to acknowledge the gravity of any submersion incident, while also recognizing that showing no signs of distress or the specific duration of submersion do not solely dictate the classification of the incident. The implications of such an event go beyond mere survival and extend into the health and safety protocols that should be implemented afterwards. Understanding this context helps to underscore the importance of recognizing near drownings for what they are—serious incidents that require appropriate attention.